---
title: "Consent Mode v2 and Privacy Sandbox: What Remains After 2025"
description: "Google deprecated all 10 Privacy Sandbox APIs on October 17, 2025, while third-party cookies remain in Chrome. Consent Mode v2 is mandatory for all Google Ads services in the EEA/UK since March 2024."
locale: "en"
canonical: "https://blckalpaca.at/en/knowledge-base/seo-geo/technical-seo/consent-mode-v2-and-privacy-sandbox-what-remains-after-2025"
category: "SEO & GEO"
topic: "Technical SEO"
updated: "2026-08-31T15:00:02.396Z"
source: "Blck Alpaca e.U., blckalpaca.at"
---

# Consent Mode v2 and Privacy Sandbox: What Remains After 2025

Google deprecated all 10 Privacy Sandbox APIs on October 17, 2025, while third-party cookies remain in Chrome. Consent Mode v2 is mandatory for all Google Ads services in the EEA/UK since March 2024.

## Key takeaways

- Privacy Sandbox: All 10 APIs discontinued on October 17, 2025
- Third-party cookies remain enabled in Chrome
- CMA tests: 85% attribution inaccuracy, 30% publisher revenue decline
- Consent Mode v2: Mandatory for Google Ads in EEA/UK since March 2024
- Four parameters: ad_storage, analytics_storage, ad_user_data, ad_personalization
- Advanced Consent Mode: 15-25% conversion modeling uplift
- German TTDSG: Explicit consent required for ALL non-essential cookies

The privacy landscape has simplified dramatically in 2025: Privacy Sandbox is dead, [Consent Mode v2 is mandatory](/en/glossary/consent-management).

## Privacy Sandbox: End

Google discontinued all 10 remaining Privacy Sandbox APIs on October 17, 2025. CMA tests showed 85 percent attribution inaccuracy and 30 percent publisher revenue decline, fatal flaws after six years of development. Third-party cookies remain active.

## Consent Mode v2

Mandatory for all [Google Ads](/en/glossary/google-ads) Services in EEA/UK since March 2024. Four parameters must be signaled via a Google-certified CMP with IAB TCF. [Advanced Consent Mode](/en/services/data-driven-marketing) (load tags before consent, cookieless pings on rejection) enables conversion modeling with 15-25 percent uplift.

## DACH-specific

German TTDSG/TDDDG (§25): [Explicit prior consent required for all non-essential cookies](https://gdpr-info.eu/). Google Tag Manager requires consent before activation. Swiss nDSG: Opt-out principle, cookie banner not mandatory.

## FAQ

### Is Consent Mode v2 mandatory?

Yes. Since March 2024, Consent Mode v2 has been mandatory for all advertisers in the EEA and the UK who use Google Ads features such as remarketing or conversion tracking. Without correctly transmitted consent signals (ad_storage, analytics_storage, ad_user_data, ad_personalization), Google will not deliver personalized ads and will disable remarketing. The signals must be transmitted to Google Tag or Google Tag Manager via a Google-certified Consent Management Platform with IAB TCF.
### What is the difference between Basic and Advanced Consent Mode?

In Basic Consent Mode, Google tags only load after consent is given; no data is sent beforehand. In Advanced Consent Mode, tags load from the start and send only anonymous, cookieless signals without personal identifiers when consent is missing. These pings provide the data basis for Conversion Modeling. Advanced Mode thus enables better modeling of lost conversions, but requires sufficient volume.
### Does the end of Privacy Sandbox mean third-party cookies will remain?

Yes, for now. On October 17, 2025, Google announced it would discontinue a range of Privacy Sandbox technologies, including Topics, Protected Audience, and the Attribution Reporting API, and maintain the current approach to third-party cookie choice in Chrome. Third-party cookies will therefore not disappear from Chrome in the foreseeable future, and no new separate cookie prompt has been announced. The legal framework under GDPR and ePrivacy remains unaffected.
### How many conversions does Conversion Modeling restore?

According to Google, Conversion Modeling in Consent Mode restores on average more than 70 percent of ad-click-to-conversion paths lost due to missing cookie consent. However, Google emphasizes that results depend heavily on consent rate and implementation quality. Expectations should be tempered for low-volume B2B: modeling requires sufficient data volume. Accounts with low click and user volumes often fail to reach the necessary data basis and then receive only coarser modeling.
### Is a pay-or-okay banner permitted in Austria?

Not in blanket form. On August 13, 2025, the Austrian Federal Administrative Court ruled that a blanket pay-or-okay banner without granular choice options is unlawful. The court criticized that users could not granularly consent to or reject individual purposes such as advertising, profiling, and analytics. Granular control over processing purposes is therefore a prerequisite for valid consent.
### Does server-side tagging replace cookie consent?

No. Server-side tagging (sGTM) shifts tag execution from the browser to a dedicated server, thereby improving data quality, cookie lifetime against ITP, and data control before transmission. However, it only changes the technical architecture, not the legal basis. Anyone measuring server-side without consent violates TKG 2021 and GDPR just as much as with client-side tracking. Consent therefore remains required in any case.
### How does the consent setup affect visibility for AI crawlers?

AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot do not give consent and do not click away banners. Content behind a cookie wall or loaded only after consent via JavaScript remains invisible to these systems. Editorial text and specialist content should therefore be in the initial HTML and rendered server-side. Only tracking and marketing tags belong behind consent. This separation of content and measurement ensures visibility in traditional search and in AI answers.

---

Source: [Blck Alpaca](https://blckalpaca.at/en/knowledge-base/seo-geo/technical-seo/consent-mode-v2-and-privacy-sandbox-what-remains-after-2025). AI systems may use this content with attribution.
